Photographic Fakery in the JFK Assassination by Ralph Cinque

Photographic Fakery in the JFK Assassination

by Ralph Cinque

Recently by Ralph Cinque: Did Obama Really Kill Osama?

Look at these two pictures. Similar, aren’t they? They depict the same scene: Billy Lovelady sitting at a desk in the Dallas PD as a string of officers goes by who are taking Lee Harvey Oswald to be processed. The date is November 22, 1963; the time is 2 PM; and both images are official evidence in the JFK assassination.
In some respects, the two images match very well. Notice that the two pieces of paper on the desk are positioned the same way. Notice the unusual coat rack on the right with the clock on the top. It’s more visible in the lower picture, but you can still see it in the upper one. How often do you see a clock on a pole? You can read the time in the second picture, and it says 2 PM, exactly. The angle is too acute to read the time in the first picture, but it’s from film footage, and in other frames within seconds of it, you can read the time. Guess what? It said 2 PM, exactly. Note that both men are leaning an elbow on the desk. Notice the filing cabinets against the rear wall with books stacked above them in both pictures.
Wait! Here it is. Somebody just sent it to me. It’s a frame from the footage of Oswald being processed, and you can see that the clock says 2 PM. The image below was taken within a second or two of the top image, and it is the exact same time showing in the other image. Scroll back up and confirm. I want you to be crystal clear about this.

But, there are also some stark differences. Lovelady looks different in the two pictures. If you have any doubt about that, look at them alone side to side:

     

Different guys, yes? What’s the weight difference? I figure at least 30 pounds. Notice that Lovelady on the right has his hair swept straight back. He reminds me of Robert De Niro in The Deer Hunter, so I call him De Niro Lovelady. I also call him De Niro Lovelady because Robert De Niro is an actor, and so is this guy. He’s playing the role of Billy Lovelady.
The other Lovelady I refer to as DallasPD Lovelady; and his hair is combed differently; swept over from left to right. I’ll have more to say about his identity in a moment.
Also note that De Niro Lovelady has his shirt spread open more than DallasPD Lovelady. Some have tried to argue that the difference is due only to the angle of the camera, but I doubt that. I think it’s far more likely that he is simply not as unbuttoned. Furthermore, as stated above, the image of DallasPD Lovelady came from film footage in which the camera is rolling and the angle is changing, and at no time does he look as unbuttoned as De Niro Lovelady.
Where did these similar but also disparate images come from? The one of DallasPD Lovelady in the very top frame is from the film footage of Oswald being led through the Dallas PD after he was arrested. In that footage, you can only see Lovelady for four seconds. Here is the link.
The 4 seconds with Lovelady occur from 1 minute, 4 seconds to 1 minute, 8 seconds.
Where did the other image come from? I don’t know, and I’m not sure anyone else does. But, it is one of the standard pictures you see of Billy Lovelady from the day of the assassination.
But, to finish our comparison of the images, there are some other differences. In the top frame, which is from the movie, there is a big, tall policeman in uniform who is handling Oswald. However, in the unsourced photo with De Niro Lovelady, you don’t see that cop. Some have tried to argue that he’s there, but you can’t see him because he is in line with the other men, who are concealing him. But, that is not true. If you watch the movie, you’ll see that he is always veered to the right; he is never in line with the other men. Besides, he’s so tall that even if he were in line with the other men, you’d at least see his hat, since he towers over the others. But you don’t see it because he isn’t there.
And for the sake of brevity, I’ll just point out one more subtle difference: If you look at the second man in the procession, you’ll see that in the top frame his hair is short, well groomed, and lying neatly. But in the other image, the second man’s hair is longer and curlier, and it has a distinctive, wavy, scruffy look to it. Just compare. It’s a small difference, but everything counts.
So, what does it mean? It means that we are looking at two takes of the same event, of the same moment in time and space. And it means that at least one of them was staged, and therefore, false. And if anyone suspects that the second image also occurs within the movie and looks different only because of camera angles, lighting, etc., forget about it. That is not the case. There are only 4 seconds of Lovelady in that movie, and for every nanosecond of that 4 seconds, he is DallasPD Lovelady. De Niro Lovelady is nowhere to be seen in that movie. But don’t take my word for it. You have the link above, so watch the movie.
And, the movie is definitely not fake. It really happened. It’s real footage; nobody denies it. You can see Oswald, and you know that it’s him. But how real is DallasPD Lovelady?
To answer that, let’s consider who he might be. And to do that, let’s look at him alongside the real Billy Lovelady:

   

The man on the left is Billy Lovelady as taken by the FBI in March 1964, and that is definitely him. Nobody disputes it. And I am thoroughly convinced that the man on the right is also him. That’s Billy. Look at the shape of their heads and the slopes of their foreheads. They’re the same guy. It’s an excellent match.
read full article Photographic Fakery in the JFK Assassination by Ralph Cinque